Regarding the JJ interview/article in Express Tribune
My comments regarding the article here: http://tribune.com.pk/story/578139/junaid-jamshed-and-the-maternal-instinct
So
much is wrong in this article. Usually I wouldn't be bothered about the
falling standards of journalism in our newspapers. But this is a new
low. Such incompetent writing coupled with lackadaisical interviewing
would seem to fit in a post on a fan club forum, but seems out of place
in a national newspaper.
My biggest issue is how Junaid
Jamshed (JJ) is presented as a reformed / born-again pious Muslim. To
present him as a hero for abandoning singing/music does nothing more
than further confuse young, impressionable minds. JJ was a celebrity and
still is. The only difference I see is that his CDs and cassettes (at
Rs. 80 and 35 respectively) were far more accessible to the common man
than his Kurtas (which run into several thousands of Rupees). Music and
poetry has been in the land that forms Pakistan as it stands today for
hundreds of years. By presenting him as a better person now for
abandoning music, we are only further confusing and contributing to the
extremism in society and only furthering the agenda of the likes of
Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, LeJ, and JuD.
Other issues in the article include:
1. The title - Junaid Jamshed and the ‘maternal instinct’. Maternal
instinct specifically mean feelings that a mother may have towards her
offspring. It has no relevance here as nothing in the article talks
about any motherly instincts of JJ. Yes, he has been working with a
charity that has been focusing on maternal health - a far cry from
'maternal instincts.
2. "Sitting in Shahi Hasan’s studio, his
fingers, a couple of times, delicately traced the contours of the guitar
strings." Guitar strings don't have contours. You either touch a guitar
string or you don't. A string is not big enough to have a contour
(contour: n. the shape of the outside edge of something).
3.
The song Us Rah Par's lyrics are quoted: "hum kyun chalain uss raah par
jis raah par sub hee chalain. Kyun na chunain wo raasta jis par naheen
koi gaya." There is nothing new about the path that Junaid has chosen.
He isn't the first naat-khwaan, nasheed artist, or charity worker in
Pakistan. He isn't even the biggest Ramadan quiz show host on TV. There
can, ofcourse, only be one Aalim online. Moreover JJ says that, at the
time of writing the lyrics above, Shoaib Mansoor "knew that something
had changed in me.” This is really not true. One only needs to see Khuda
Ke Liye and read up on Mr. Mansoor's interviews around the time the
movie was released to understand which 'raasta' he would have liked for
his protege.
4. [FROM THE ARTICLE: I lived that (Vital Signs
era) part of my life to the fullest. But now that is the past,” he said,
with a direct look, again defying the pre-conceived notion that he no
longer talks to women directly or makes eye contact with the opposite
sex]. Whose pre-conceived notion? Surely with regular appearances in the
media, JJ is bound to be interacting with women. In any case, it would
be downright rude of him to not look at the interviewer. Shouldn't the
fact that he's being inteviewed by a female reporter mean that he is
'liberal' enough? Though I'm really not sure what the point is here - is
the fact that he has a beard but can still answer questions to female
interviews "with a direct look" supposed to be laudable?
Really shoddy journalism. The land of Bulleh Shah, Mian Muhammad Baksh
and Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai derserves better. Thankfully we have people
like Arieb Azhar who can still talk, and sing, about tolerance and humanity which is needed more in these times than Kurtas.
posted by Omer at 6:07 PM 0 comments